Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JUNE 2006

When is a Secondee Not a Secondee? Update on the Use of Secondments in Outsourcings

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

The use of employee secondments in outsourcings is widespread. Staff, whose employment might otherwise transfer from customer to service provider pursuant to the Acquired Rights Directive ("ARD"), instead remain employees of the customer and are then seconded to the service provider.

United StatesEmployment and HR

The use of employee secondments in outsourcings is widespread. Staff, whose employment might otherwise transfer from customer to service provider pursuant to the Acquired Rights Directive ("ARD"), instead remain employees of the customer and are then seconded to the service provider. Customers, service providers and staff may often prefer such an arrangement to an outright transfer. Customers can retain staff who would otherwise transfer and service providers have access to, and the assistance of, key staff at the start of the contract. Staff also appreciate the element of choice which secondment gives them. In short, secondments often provide the desired flexibility which a strict application of the ARD does not allow. However, a recent House of Lords ("HL") decision in the UK suggests that the issue of secondment in the context of an ARD transfer needs to be approached with great caution to avoid unforeseen, and potentially unfavourable, consequences for all of those involved.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from