Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 NOVEMBER 2012

Virginia Recognizes Individual Liability For Wrongful Discharge

Unlike many states that have substantially revised and effectively limited the operation of the employment-at-will doctrine, Virginia has rejected similar efforts for decades.

United StatesEmployment and HR

In VanBuren v. Grubb, No. 120348 (Nov. 1, 2012), a sharply divided Supreme Court of Virginia surprised employers by holding that a common law tort action for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy may be brought against an individual manager or supervisor.

Wrongful Discharge in Virginia

Unlike many states that have substantially revised and effectively limited the operation of the employment-at-will doctrine, Virginia has rejected similar efforts for decades. Today, Virginia is one of the few states that continues to "strongly adhere" to the traditional employment-at-will doctrine. Exceptions to employment at will in Virginia are both few in number and narrow in scope. The state supreme court created one such exception in Bowman v. State Bank of Keysville, 229 Va. 534 (1985), holding that a corporate employer could be held liable in tort for wrongfully discharging two shareholder employees of the corporation for refusing to vote their shares in accordance

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from