Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 OCTOBER 2015

Vargas: The Next Step In The ‘Peculiar' Evolution

In the recent decision Vargas v. FMI, Inc. (2015) 233 Cal.App.4th 638, plaintiff Vargas and Villalobos were a two-man team driving a tractor-trailer cross country.

United StatesEmployment and HR
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Author LinkedIn connections

In the recent decision Vargas v. FMI, Inc. (2015) 233 Cal.App.4th 638, plaintiff Vargas and Villalobos were a two-man team driving a tractor-trailer cross country. Shortly into the journey, with Villalobos driving and plaintiff asleep in the sleeper berth, Villalobos fell asleep at the wheel and the tractor-trailer rolled over, injuring plaintiff. Plaintiff sued (1) the motor carrier and trailer owner, (2) the tractor owner, (3) the tractor owner's principal, and (4) Villalobos. The trial court granted the motor carrier's/trailer owner's motion for summary judgment on the grounds that it was not vicariously liable for plaintiff's injuries as the hirer of an independent contractor, pursuant to Privette v. Sup. Ct. (1993) 5 Cal.4th 689, and its progeny, including SeaBright Ins. Co. v. US Airways, Inc. (2011) 52 Cal.4th 590, which recognized that there was an implied and presumed delegation of workplace safety in contracts entered into between hirers and independent

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from