Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 NOVEMBER 2026

The Next Wave Of Restrictive Covenants Litigation: When Function Matters More Than Form

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

As employers move beyond traditional noncompete agreements, a new challenge emerges: provisions that don't explicitly prohibit competition but effectively restrict employee mobility through confidentiality clauses, training repayment obligations, and cumulative contractual restraints. Courts and regulators are increasingly scrutinizing whether these alternative restrictions function as de facto noncompetes, regardless of their labels.

United StatesEmployment and HR

A consequential noncompete may be the one that’s not called a noncompete at all.

It may appear as a confidentiality clause that prevents an employee from using the knowledge needed to continue working in the industry. Or a client non-solicitation or no-service provision that places much of the available market off limits. Or a training-repayment obligation that makes leaving prohibitively expensive.

Whatever the label, the practical message may be the same: You’re free to leave—but not to compete.

After the Federal Trade Commission abandoned its defense of its rule banning noncompetes, employers focused on bringing traditional noncompetes into compliance with an increasingly fragmented body of state law. Many narrowed their restrictions, adopted compensation thresholds, excluded lower-wage workers, or stopped using noncompetes altogether.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from