Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 FEBRUARY 2008

The Friends Case: Just How Friendly Is It?

On April 20, 2006, the California Supreme Court issued its ruling in a sexual harassment case entitled Lyle v. Warner Bros. Television Productions (38 Cal.4th 264).

United StatesEmployment and HR
Nicole Gomes
Nicole Gomes

On April 20, 2006, the California Supreme Court issued its ruling in a sexual harassment case entitled Lyle v. Warner Bros. Television Productions (38 Cal.4th 264). In Lyle, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether sexually explicit language used during the writing process for a popular sitcom, Friends, constituted actionable sexual harassment under California law. The Supreme Court unanimously held in favor of Warner Bros., upholding the lower court's dismissal of the complaint.

Before thinking that this decision gives free reign to sexually explicit conversation in the workplace, employers must take a moment to examine what this case really means—and what it does not mean.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from