Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 FEBRUARY 2004

Sex Discrimination Class Actions and Merit-Based Compensation: Is Your System at Risk?

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

Over the past few years, the plaintiffs’ bar has developed a potentially powerful theory of sex discrimination which has particular significance for merit-based compensation systems. In numerous class actions predicated on this theory, employers across diverse industries -- retail, financial services, higher education -- have paid significant sums for apparent gender disparities in pay and promotions within their ranks

United StatesEmployment and HR

Over the past few years, the plaintiffs’ bar has developed a potentially powerful theory of sex discrimination which has particular significance for merit-based compensation systems. In numerous class actions predicated on this theory, employers across diverse industries -- retail, financial services, higher education -- have paid significant sums for apparent gender disparities in pay and promotions within their ranks. For example, Merrill Lynch recently settled a sex discrimination class action for an amount reportedly in excess of $100 million.1 In 1997, Home Depot paid out $87.5 million,2 and in 2002, American Express Financial Advisers, Inc., agreed to pay $31 million3 Morgan Stanley4 and Wal-Mart5 are presently fending off similar claims. The Wal-Mart suit, if certified, will constitute the largest sex discrimination class action in history, with hundreds of millions of dollars at stake.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from