Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 NOVEMBER 2010

Section 409A Compliance: A Second Bite at the Apple Ends December 31st

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, which regulates non-qualified deferred compensation arrangements, was signed into law in 2004 and went into effect January 1, 2005.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Introduction

Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code ("Section 409A"), which regulates non-qualified deferred compensation arrangements, was signed into law in 2004 and went into effect January 1, 2005. Not only did Section 409A establish many new requirements for deferred compensation, but it also expanded the traditional notion of deferred compensation to include, among other arrangements, bonus plans, reimbursement policies, severance agreements, change in control agreements, and employment agreements.

If a plan or arrangement is not otherwise exempt from Section 409A and does not comply with its provisions, the employee/participant is subject to accelerated income tax on vested amounts (without regard to whether the amounts are currently payable), an additional 20% penalty tax (in addition to regular income tax), and possible interest penalties if the accelerated income taxes are not paid on time. There may also be additional tax consequences under state law.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from