Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 APRIL 2020

Ninth Circuit Creates ‘Concise Explanation' Standard For Background Check Disclosure Forms

On March 20, 2020, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion Walker v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 8809 and created a "concise explanation" standard to judge when an employer's background check disclosure form violates FCRA.

United StatesEmployment and HR

On March 20, 2020, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion Walker v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 8809 (9th Cir. Mar. 20, 2020) and created a "concise explanation" standard to judge when an employer's background check disclosure form violates FCRA.

Plaintiff applied for a job at Fred Meyer's supermarkets.  As part of the application process, plaintiff completed two forms related to a background check.  The first form was a "Disclosure Regarding Consumer Reports and Investigative Consumer Reports."  The second form was an "Authorization Regarding Consumer Reports and Investigative Consumer Reports."

Plaintiff was hired but then received a "pre-adverse action notice" created by the consumer reporting agency.  The "pre-adverse action notice" provided a copy of the consumer report and informed plaintiff that he could dispute the accuracy of the report with the consumer reporting agency.  Ultimately, Fred Meyer terminated plaintiff based on information found in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from