Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 NOVEMBER 2012

Intent Is Irrelevant: Changing Workweek To Reduce Overtime Costs Valid Under FLSA

The employees at issue, operators of Redland’s two drilling rigs, initially worked 12-hour shifts for seven consecutive days and then would be off for the next seven days.

United StatesEmployment and HR

In Abshire v. Redland Energy Services, LLC,  five current and former employees filed a complaint against Redland Energy Services, LLC, a servicer of natural gas wells, alleging the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to properly pay overtime. The employees' claims arise from a change to their defined workweek under the FLSA and the impact on their overtime hours as a result.

The employees at issue, operators of Redland's two drilling rigs, initially worked 12-hour shifts for seven consecutive days and then would be off for the next seven days. While these employees were subject to a Tuesday-to-Monday workweek for calculating overtime, all other Redland employees had a Sunday-to-Saturday workweek. Then, in May 2009, Redland changed the drilling rig employees' workweek to Sunday-to-Saturday. The memo announcing the change stated: "There will be no adjustment of your work week, which will remain from Tuesday-Monday [but] you will begin to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from