Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 AUGUST 2005

For Whom The Whistle Blows

With the media attention on Enron and Sarbanes Oxley, employers may comfort themselves by viewing whistleblower law as a source of liability which may be narrowed to a single law, a single type of violation, or even a single type of employer.

United StatesEmployment and HR
Kim Baker
Kim Baker
Todd Sorensen
Todd Sorensen

I. Introduction

No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friend's or of thine own were. Any man's death diminishes me because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.1

With the media attention on Enron and Sarbanes Oxley, employers may comfort themselves by viewing whistleblower law as a source of liability which may be narrowed to a single law, a single type of violation, or even a single type of employer. In reality, whistleblower protection defies legal and industrial boundaries, and courts continue to expand safeguards depending upon the unique circumstances of each case. As a result, employers cannot look to a single statute or legal principle to determine potential liability. Instead, coupling an understanding of fundamental sources of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from