Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 OCTOBER 2015

Employment Law Commentary - Volume 27, Issue 9

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

The short answer to the question is, "Not yet." Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.

United StatesEmployment and HR

THE NLRB'S DECISION IN BROWNINGFERRIS INDUSTRIES OF CALIFORNIA (2015) ONE MONTH LATER: IS THE SKY FALLING FOR EMPLOYERS?

By Eric A. Tate and Timothy F. Ryan

The short answer to the question is, "Not yet." Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.1 expanded the definition of joint employer under the National Labor Relations Act (the "NLRA" or the "Act") and is arguably the National Labor Relations Board's (the "NLRB" or the "Board") most significant decision of 2015. Many believe that Browning-Ferris will have far-reaching effects for years to come, including beyond the unionized workplace. This article discusses the decision, selected key potential implications for employers, and takes a brief look at the early fallout from Browning-Ferris.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from