Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JULY 2015

EEOC Updates Pregnancy Discrimination Guidance

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

Last week, the EEOC announced an update to its Enforcement Guidance on Pregnancy Discrimination and Related Issues ("Enforcement Guidance") to reflect the Supreme Court's recent decision in Young v. UPS.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Last week, the EEOC announced an update to its Enforcement Guidance on Pregnancy Discrimination and Related Issues ("Enforcement Guidance") to reflect the Supreme Court's recent decision in Young v. UPS.

As we blogged about in March, the Court in Young articulated a new standard applicable to claims brought under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act ("PDA"), when a plaintiff claims that she has been denied an accommodation for a pregnancy-related work restriction given to others who are not pregnant, but who are similar in their ability or inability to work. Under the new standard, if an employer points to a neutral policy as its legitimate reason for the differential treatment, a plaintiff can demonstrate that the policy is a pretext for discrimination by proving that the policy imposes a "significant burden" on pregnant workers, and that the reasons for the policy are not "sufficiently strong to justify the burden."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from