Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JULY 2014

Duran v. U.S. Bank: When Class Certification Goes Wrong

The trial judge lost control of the certification and evidentiary presentation of the case resulting in a $15 million verdict against U.S. Bank National Association.

United StatesEmployment and HR

The California Supreme Court recently handed down a landmark decision on class actions. The trial judge lost control of the certification and evidentiary presentation of the case resulting in a $15 million verdict against U.S. Bank National Association (USB). In this long-awaited decision, the California Supreme Court acknowledged the blatant errors perpetrated by the trial court and class counsel, and provided valuable guidance for employers and their attorneys in defending class actions. Duran v. U.S. Bank National Association.

Microscopic Sampling

In this case, loan officers who were hired as outside salespersons claimed they were misclassified as exempt. In California, outside salespersons are exempt from overtime and minimum wage requirements if they customarily and regularly work more than half of their working time away from the employer's place of business selling products or services. Duran turned on whether loan officers spent more than 50% of their time

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from