Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 FEBRUARY 2013

D.C. Circuit Rules NLRB Recess Appointments Unconstitutional

The ruling places in substantial doubt the validity of any NLRB decision or action since January 4, 2012, and calls into question the scope of the president's recess appointment power more generally.

United StatesEmployment and HR
David Broderdorf
David Broderdorf
Daniel Bordoni
Daniel Bordoni
John Ring
John Ring
Ross Friedman
Ross Friedman
Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP'S Labor & Employment Practice
Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP'S Labor & Employment Practice

The ruling places in substantial doubt the validity of any NLRB decision or action since January 4, 2012, and calls into question the scope of the president's recess appointment power more generally.

On January 25, in Noel Canning v. National Labor Relations Board, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit unanimously ruled that President Barack Obama's three recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) in January 2012 were unconstitutional.1 This decision has potentially far-reaching effects as it calls into question the validity of NLRB decisions since the appointments, as well as the president's recess appointment power generally.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from