Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JULY 2017

Court Dismisses Class Action Claims Based On Afghanistan Labor Code

BakerHostetler
BakerHostetler
Contributor
BakerHostetler

BakerHostetler

Recognized as an innovator and one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler helps...

View firm profile
Explore more from BakerHostetler

United States lawsuits involving the law of Afghanistan are uncommon, but it is common for employees to bring suit based on work done abroad generally...

United StatesEmployment and HR

United States lawsuits involving the law of Afghanistan are uncommon, but it is common for employees to bring suit based on work done abroad generally, and not just in that one country. A recent case, however, illustrates that while the United States may be a more convenient forum, even a class action may founder if the law of the host country provides for no relief.

In Allen v. Fluor Corp., Civil Action no. 3:16-CV-1219-D (N.D. Tex. June 15, 2017), the plaintiffs were United States citizens who worked for a contractor in Afghanistan that provided noncombat logistical services. Presumably, this is a euphemism for "not military." They contended that they worked overtime hours and were entitled to overtime pay based on Afghanistan's Labor Code, and sought to pursue their claims on a class-wide basis.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from