Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JULY 2007

Recent Developments in Employment Law

Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Duane Morris LLP

On June 14, 2007, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the district court's determination that statements made on an NASD Form U-5 are subject to an "absolute privilege" and therefore do not give rise to liability in a defamation lawsuit.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Contents:

  • The Second Circuit Upholds Absolute Privilege for Form U-5 Statements
  • U.S. Supreme Court: "Companions" to Aged or Infirm Employed by Third Parties May Be Exempt from Federal Minimum Wage and Overtime
  • Transgender Protections Afforded Under New Jersey Law Against Discrimination
  • New Florida Law Protects Employees Who Are Victims of Domestic Violence
  • Granting FMLA Leave Is Not Conclusive Evidence Employer Regarded Employee as "Disabled"
  • The Second Circuit Upholds Absolute Privilege for Statements Made on a Form U-5

    On June 14, 2007, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the district court's determination that statements made on an NASD Form U-5 are subject to an "absolute privilege" and therefore do not give rise to liability in a defamation lawsuit. As discussed below, Rosenberg v. Metlife, Inc., No. 05-4363 (2d Cir. 2007), resolved an unsettled issue in New York regarding the protection afforded to National Association of

    We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

    See more popular content from