Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JANUARY 2016

股东特派董事的金带 "Golden Leash" 特殊薪酬在美国备受争议(英文版)

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

In the past few years, much attention has been paid to the issue of special compensation arrangements sometimes paid by so-called activist shareholders to their director nominees in proxy fights.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

In the past few years, much attention has been paid to the issue of special compensation arrangements sometimes paid by so-called activist shareholders to their director nominees in proxy fights. Activists claim that these arrangements provide appropriate compensation for insurgent director nominees and are necessary to recruit qualified candidates for board service, particularly in the case of a contested election. Companies argue, however, that the payment of incentive compensation by a sponsoring shareholder establishes a two-tiered compensation structure for the board, creates dissension in the boardroom, and fosters continuing allegiances between the director and the activist shareholder following the election. Further, if the sponsoring shareholder has a short-term investment horizon, these arrangements may incentivize the director nominees to focus on the activists' interests or short-term goals at the expense of long-term value creation for all shareholders. As

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from