Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 SEPTEMBER 2016

Summary Judgment Horror Story For Stephen King's Literary Agent

Sheppard
Sheppard
Contributor
Sheppard

Sheppard

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more...

View firm profile
Explore more from Sheppard

While many breach of contract cases are resolved by motions to dismiss or summary judgment, a recent decision has shown that when it comes to summary judgment the path of least resistance is often haunted.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

While many breach of contract cases are resolved by motions to dismiss or summary judgment, a recent decision from the Appellate Division, First Department, Kramer v. Greene, (1st Dep't Aug. 11, 2016), has shown that when it comes to summary judgment, the path of least resistance is often haunted.

In the underlying action, pending before New York County Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich, an attorney brought breach of contract, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment claims against the literary agent for Stephen King. The plaintiff, Jay Kramer, provided legal and professional services to defendants in connection with various literary deals for Mr. King. Mr. Kramer was compensated based on commissions from the deals he assisted in. However, after Mr. Kramer was terminated, allegedly at Stephen King's insistence, defendants ceased paying the commissions on completed works. Mr. Kramer alleged that the parties had an oral agreement which entitled him to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from