Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JANUARY 2023

Second Circuit Decision Curtails Title 18 Insider Trading Liability

Katten
Katten
Contributor
Katten

Katten

With client service at our core and a collective desire to foster an inclusive environment for a...

View firm profile
Explore more from Katten

On December 27, 2022, a divided panel of the Second Circuit issued a majority opinion in United States v. Blaszczak ("Blaszczak II"), reconsidering the contours...

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

On December 27, 2022, a divided panel of the Second Circuit issued a majority opinion in United States v. Blaszczak ("Blaszczak II"), reconsidering the contours of Title 18 insider trading liability. While the decision does not come as a surprise, it does have potentially far-reaching ramifications for the government's ability to make use of Title 18 to prosecute fraud and theft charges.

Factual and Procedural Background

The Blaszczak prosecution involved allegations that a political intelligence consultant received nonpublic information from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS"), a government agency, concerning planned changes to Medicare reimbursement rates for particular drugs. The consultant then shared that information with two clients, who allegedly traded in securities of companies that would be affected by CMS's forthcoming changes.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from