Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 NOVEMBER 2021

"Mission Critical" Board Oversight

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

Boeing decision suggests importance of board oversight over critical risks and operations in Caremark claims.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

Boeing decision suggests importance of board oversight over critical risks  and operations in Caremark claims

On September 7, 2021, a Delaware court largely denied The Boeing Company's ("Boeing") motion to dismiss  a stockholder derivative suit against Boeing directors in connection with two crashes of Boeing's 737 MAX  airplane in October 2018 and March 2019. In In re The Boeing Company Derivative Litigation, No. 2019- 0907-MTZ (Del. Ch. Sept. 7, 2021), the plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that Boeing's board of directors  had breached its fiduciary duty of oversight under the standards established in In re Caremark International Inc.  Derivative Litigation, 698 A.2d 959 (Del. Ch. 1996) and Marchand v. Barnhill, 212 A.3d 805 (Del. 2019) by failing  to establish an adequate reporting system for airplane safety and "turning a blind eye to a red flag representing  airplane safety problems". Though noting that Caremark claims are "possibly the most difficult

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from