Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 OCTOBER 2026

NAD Reviews Discount Claims

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contributor
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

About Kelley Drye We’re focused—in key areas of the law and on the nuances of each matter—to help...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Guardian Bikes faced scrutiny from the National Advertising Division over its "40% OFF" claims and countdown timers, raising questions about whether consumers might interpret everyday competitive pricing as temporary discounts. The case highlights growing regulatory attention to how companies communicate sales and limited-time offers, with implications for marketers using similar promotional tactics.

United StatesConsumer Protection

Although we’ve seen a steady stream of litigation in recent years focusing on how companies advertise sales, sales haven’t been a hot topic in NAD cases. Last week, however, NAD announced a decision involving Guardian Bikes’ sale practices. Notably, the case was initiated by NAD itself, rather than a competitor, suggesting that we may see more of these cases in the future.

NAD’s inquiry focused on claims such as “40% OFF All Bikes,” “You’ve Got 40% OFF,” and “Sale Ends In” followed by a countdown timer. NAD also reviewed strike-through pricing that compared a current price to a higher reference price. Guardian’s bikes were generally advertised at prices that were roughly 40% below a “Comparable Value” benchmark derived from competitor pricing, rather than 40% below Guardian’s own former prices.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from