Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JANUARY 2016

Litigation Strategies For Debunking Daubert Expert Testimony

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

As plaintiffs increasingly hire "expert" witnesses who advocate rather than present the fact-finder specialized knowledge or expertise, knowing how and when to identify, discredit or outright exclude questionable expert testimony is more valuable than ever.

United StatesConsumer Protection

As plaintiffs increasingly hire "expert" witnesses who advocate rather than present the fact-finder specialized knowledge or expertise, knowing how and when to identify, discredit or outright exclude questionable expert testimony is more valuable than ever.

This report explores key legal techniques for evaluating expert witnesses and the credibility of their testimony, as well as useful tools for defendants to challenge such testimony. Topics include:

  • Maximizing the MDL Daubert Process;
  • Excluding Expert Opinion Impugning Corporate Ethics, Motive and State of Mind;
  • Deconstructing Plaintiffs' Peer-Reviewed Scientific Literature;
  • Excluding or Limiting FDA Regulatory Expert Opinion; and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from