Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 SEPTEMBER 2011

FCRA Newsletter - September 14, 2011

Facts: Plaintiff claimed that Defendant Cargill, Inc. ("Cargill") violated his rights under the FCRA when it rescinded an offer of employment based on information obtained from a consumer report.

United StatesConsumer Protection

Employee Applicant Confuses FCRA Employer Notice Requirements in Adverse Use of Credit Report

John D. Reinke v. Cargill, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66313 (E.D. Wis. June 21, 2011)

Facts: Plaintiff claimed that Defendant Cargill, Inc. ("Cargill") violated his rights under the FCRA when it rescinded an offer of employment based on information obtained from a consumer report. Plaintiff began working as a temporary employee at Cargill and applied three months later for a permanent position. Upon receiving the application, Cargill obtained Plaintiff's consumer report that contained personal financial, credit and other private information including his conviction record. The consumer report inaccurately stated that the Plaintiff was convicted of intentional homicide when in fact he was convicted of reckless homicide. Cargill mailed the Plaintiff a conditional offer letter stating that it had obtained a consumer report on him, and enclosed a copy of the consumer report

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from