Citing Seventh Circuit precedent, the Eastern District of
Wisconsin recently held the broad scope of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act's permissible purpose includes use that
disregards an attempted restriction requested by the consumer.
In Long v. Bergstrom Victory Lane, Inc., No.
18-cv-688, 2018 WL 4829192 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 4, 2018),
consumer Emily Long alleged that automotive dealer Bergstrom
Victory Lane violated the FCRA and state law by disregarding the
limitations she requested in connection with her auto finance
application.
Long claims she visited the dealership with pre-qualified
financing already arranged from a specified lender. Long allegedly
told the dealer's employee about her pre-qualification and
advised them that she only granted permission to run her credit
report for use with her specific lender and no other entity.
Despite allegedly agreeing to Long's request, the dealer
submitted her credit application to multiple other companies. Long
claimed the