Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 DECEMBER 2012

Supreme Court To Determine Antitrust Standards For Reverse Payment Settlements

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the request of the Federal Trade Commission to review a decision of the Eleventh Circuit in Federal Trade Commission v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

In a late breaking but widely expected development, the Supreme Court of the United States granted the request of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to review a decision of the Eleventh Circuit in Federal Trade Commission v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1 The defendants acquiesced in the FTC's request for Supreme Court review.

The case involves the Eleventh Circuit's decision to affirm a district court order dismissing the FTC's complaint alleging that a "reverse payment settlement" violated the antitrust laws. A reverse payment settlement involves the settlement of patent litigation brought under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act, Pub. L. No. 98-417, 98 Stat. 1585 (commonly known as the Hatch-Waxman Act) in which the patent holder and brand-name drug manufacturer agrees to resolve its patent lawsuit against the manufacturer of a generic drug by paying the generic drug manufacturer a specified sum and the generic drug manufacturer agreeing

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from