Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 MARCH 2005

Supreme Court Docket Report - 2004 Term - Number 9

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

The Robinson- Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(a), makes it unlawful "to discriminate in price between different purchasers" of comparable commodities "where the effect of such discrimination may be * * * to injure, destroy, or prevent competition with any person who * * * knowingly receives the benefit of such discrimination." In <I>Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. </I>v. <I>Reeder-Simco GMC, Inc.</I>, No. 04-905, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine, in a competitive-bidding context, th

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

Originally published March 7, 2005

On March 7, 2005, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in one case of interest to the business community. Amicus briefs in support of petitioner will be due on Thursday, April 21, 2005, and amicus briefs in support of respondent will be due on Thursday, May 26, 2005.

1. Robinson-Patman Act — Purchasers and Cognizable Damages.

The Robinson- Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(a), makes it unlawful "to discriminate in price between different purchasers" of comparable commodities "where the effect of such discrimination may be * * * to injure, destroy, or prevent competition with any person who * * * knowingly receives the benefit of such discrimination." In Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. Reeder-Simco GMC, Inc., No. 04-905, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine, in a competitive-bidding context, the proper definition of "purchaser" and the extent of cognizable damages.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from