Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 MAY 2025

Roster Limits Remain A Sticking Point To Settle Landmark NIL Case Against The NCAA

On April 23, Judge Claudia Wilken issued an order in the ongoing antitrust class action, House v. NCAA.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

On April 23, Judge Claudia Wilken issued an order in the ongoing antitrust class action, House v. NCAA.The order, discussing a settlement agreement between the parties, stated that the Court can tentatively grant final approval of the settlement agreement, "[w]ith the exception of the immediate implementation of the roster limits provisions."

In a final settlement approval hearing on April 7, Judge Wilken expressed two primary concerns:

  • the immediate implementation of roster limits and
  • the settlement's binding effect on future college athletes, releasing their potential claims against the NCAA.

The parties amended the settlement agreement after the April 7 approval hearing, but they only addressed one of Judge Wilken's concerns; the settlement will no longer bind future NCAA athletes until they are given an opportunity to object to the settlement agreement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from