Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 OCTOBER 2014

Mushroom Growers Denied Capper-Volstead Antitrust Immunity

The Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied a motion for reconsideration brought by members and affiliates of the former Eastern Mushroom Marketing Cooperative.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

On October 14, 2014, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied a motion for reconsideration brought by members and affiliates of the former Eastern Mushroom Marketing Cooperative (EMMC).  In re Mushroom Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig., No. 06-0620 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 14, 2014).  In 2009, the court denied defendants' motion for partial summary judgment, which argued that defendants were immune from antitrust liability as members of an agricultural cooperative under the Capper-Volstead Act, 7 U.S.C. § 291.  The court gave two reasons for denying the motion: (1) the EMMC allegedly conspired with entities that were not engaged in agricultural production and (2) non-grower M. Cutone's membership in the cooperative destroyed Capper-Volstead immunity.  Defendants moved for reconsideration in light of intervening authority from the Supreme Court in American Needle Inc. v. Nat'l Football League, 560 U.S. 783 (2010), and the Third Circuit in Deutscher Tennis Bund v. APT Tour, Inc.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from