Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 DECEMBER 2011

Murky Waters: The FTC Dives Into Exclusionary Supply Contracts

Although most supply agreements are a benign business reality, when favorable terms negotiated with a supplier foreclose the buyer’s rivals from competing, the antitrust waters can get murky, and buyers, especially those with market power, risk government investigations and private litigation.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Morgan Lewis Antitrust Practice
Morgan Lewis Antitrust Practice

Although most supply agreements are a benign business reality, when favorable terms negotiated with a supplier foreclose the buyer's rivals from competing, the antitrust waters can get murky, and buyers, especially those with market power, risk government investigations and private litigation.

In a recent enforcement action, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on November 21 entered into a consent order with Pool Corporation, Inc. (Pool Corp.) that required the company to remove any provisions in its agreements with pool supply manufacturers that could prevent new entrants from gaining a foothold in the pool supply distribution market. Two days later, a pool dealer echoed the FTC complaint in a new class action suit against Pool Corp. alleging monopolization and seeking treble damages.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from