Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 MARCH 2009

LinkLine: Little Room Left For Price Squeeze Claims

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

The Supreme Court ruled last week that “price squeeze” claims cannot be brought under the federal antitrust laws unless the defendant firm has a separate antitrust duty to deal with the plaintiffs in the first place.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

The Supreme Court ruled last week that "price squeeze" claims cannot be brought under the federal antitrust laws unless the defendant firm has a separate antitrust duty to deal with the plaintiffs in the first place. Pacific Bell Tel. Co. v. LinkLine Communications, Inc., 555 U.S. __ (2009). This ruling overturns long-established appellate court precedent and effectively abolishes price squeeze liability as an independent basis for bringing antitrust claims against dominant vertically integrated firms. The decision also highlights the Supreme Court's recent trend toward giving firms more room under the antitrust laws to take unilateral action against rivals without fear of liability.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from