Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JULY 2006

Justice Department Requires Additional Divestitures to Resolve Competitive Concerns Regarding Exelon-PSEG Merger

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

Almost a year after the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) approved the $16 billion merger between Exelon Corp. (Exelon) and Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. (PSEG), the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it will require the merging parties to divest six fossil-fuel fired electricity generating plants with a total capacity of approximately 5,600 megawatts (MW) to resolve concerns that the merger would likely cause higher prices for electricity in the mid-Atlantic regio

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

Introduction

Almost a year after the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) approved the $16 billion merger between Exelon Corp. (Exelon) and Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. (PSEG), the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it will require the merging parties to divest six fossil-fuel fired electricity generating plants with a total capacity of approximately 5,600 megawatts (MW) to resolve concerns that the merger would likely cause higher prices for electricity in the mid-Atlantic region.  The enforcement action is significant for several reasons:

  • First, based on the theory of competitive harm sketched out in DOJ’s Complaint, this enforcement action appears to be the first case brought by DOJ against an electric utility merger to prevent potential anticompetitive conduct that may arise from so-called “fuel-curve effects.”  

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from