Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 DECEMBER 2022

Is This The Beginning Of A Sentencing Revolution?

BakerHostetler
BakerHostetler
Contributor
BakerHostetler

BakerHostetler

Recognized as an innovator and one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler helps...

View firm profile
Explore more from BakerHostetler

On Nov. 30, 2022, following the U.S. Supreme Court's 2019 decision in Keiser v. Wilkie and contrary to the guidelines' own commentary, the Third Circuit decided that the loss enhancement to the fraud guideline...

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

Third Circuit Limits Sentencing Guidelines to Actual Loss:Implications for Fraud and Possibly Antitrust Sentencing

Key Takeaways

  • The Third Circuit recently decided that the loss enhancement to the fraud guideline in the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines applies only to "actual loss" and not to "intended loss."
  • While the primary impact of this decision is on federal sentencing in fraud cases, the Third Circuit decision potentially has broad-reaching sentencing implications, including in criminal antitrust cases such as recent attempted monopolization prosecutions.

On Nov. 30, 2022, following the U.S. Supreme Court's 2019 decision in Keiser v. Wilkie and contrary to the guidelines' own commentary, the Third Circuit decided that the loss enhancement to the fraud guideline in the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines ("USSG") applies only to "actual loss" and not to "intended loss." This distinction, the limitation to actual loss, is enormous, particularly for criminal

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from