Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 DECEMBER 2012

FTC-DOJ Workshop On Patent Assertion Entity Activities: Fresh Thinking On Potential Antitrust Responses To Abusive Patent Troll Enforcement Practices

The still commonly used but politically incorrect "patent troll" epithet was barely heard throughout eight hours of lively dialogue at this past Monday’s FTCDOJ Workshop on Patent Assertion Entity Activities.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

The still commonly used but politically incorrect "patent troll" epithet was barely heard throughout eight hours of lively dialogue at this past Monday's FTCDOJ Workshop on Patent Assertion Entity Activities. The day was devoted to an exploration of "the impact of patent assertion entity (PAE) activities on innovation and competition and the implications for antitrust enforcement and policy"; the workshop was organized to "examine the economic and legal implications of PAE activity, as distinguished from prototypical 'nonpracticing entity' (NPE) activity, such as developing and transferring technology."1 Put another way, the targets or potential targets of attack excluded universities, garage inventors and other such engines of innovation. The focus was upon entities that only purchase patents from existing owners and thereafter seek to maximize revenues through licensing or litigating against manufacturers that are already using the patented technology.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from