Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 DECEMBER 2011

FTC Does Not Embrace Dentist Board’s Anticompetitive Activity

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC or Commission) has a long history of challenging state licensing boards’ actions that restrict competition.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC or Commission) has a long history of challenging state licensing boards' actions that restrict competition. This history includes advocating against restrictive legislation at the state level and litigation — some of which has reached the Supreme Court — on restrictive rules, such as limiting when and under what circumstances non-medical practitioners can conduct eye exams, provide oral exams and basic teeth cleaning services, and interpret x-rays. On December 2, 2011, the FTC added to this history when it unanimously concluded that the North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners (the Board) illegally thwarted competition by working to bar non-dentist providers of teeth whitening goods and services (such as mall kiosks, spas, retail stores, and salons) from selling their products to consumers. In reaching this conclusion, the Commission rejected the Board's state action defense and substantively determined that certain actions of the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from