Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 DECEMBER 2024

FTC's Last Attempt To Revitalize The RPA?

On December 12, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sued Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits (Southern)—the largest wholesale distributor of wine and spirits in the country...

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

On December 12, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sued Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits (Southern)—the largest wholesale distributor of wine and spirits in the country—in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California under the Robinson-Patman Act (RPA), potentially breathing new enforcement life into the often unenforced law.

The RPA, 15 U.S.C. § 13, is a New Deal-era statute prohibiting sellers of commodity products from charging different prices to competing purchasers of those commodities. A violation occurs when a business sells the same goods at roughly the same time at two different prices to two different competing customers, with the price difference creating a competitive injury. Discriminating in promotional allowances—such as marketing support—can also constitute a violation. Buyers can also be liable along with the seller if the buyer knowingly induces and receives discriminatory pricing or promotional allowances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from