Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 MAY 2011

FCPA: Regulators’ Expansive "Foreign Official" Definition Under Attack

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

For the last several years, federal regulators have enforced the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the "FCPA") with an unprecedented, aggressive approach.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

For the last several years, federal regulators have enforced the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the "FCPA") with an unprecedented, aggressive approach. And, for the most part—rather than litigate—companies and individuals alike have negotiated resolutions behind closed doors, leaving the regulators' expansive interpretation of the FCPA unchallenged and untested in the courts. That is, until very recently.

A necessary element to prove a violation of the FCPA is that the intended recipient of the corrupt payment be a "foreign official." There is little doubt that a person with an official position and corresponding title (i.e. Senator or Minister) fits within the statute. In enforcing the FCPA, however, federal regulators look beyond titles and take a nearly boundless view of who qualifies as a "foreign official." The statute defines the term "foreign official" as:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from