Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 OCTOBER 2006

Fall 2006 Supreme Court Preview: Antitrust

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

For the upcoming fall term, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear two significant antitrust cases, Bell Atlantic v. Twombley, Case No. 05-1126 (2006), and Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co., Case No. 05-381 (2006). There is also a chance that the Court may grant certiorari in another important antitrust case in the coming months — Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., Case No. 06A179 (2006).

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

For the upcoming fall term, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear two significant antitrust cases, Bell Atlantic v. Twombley, Case No. 05-1126 (2006), and Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co., Case No. 05-381 (2006). There is also a chance that the Court may grant certiorari in another important antitrust case in the coming months — Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., Case No. 06A179 (2006).

Bell Atlantic v. Twombley

: When Does Parallel Competitive Conduct Equal "Conspiracy"?

The Issue

In Bell Atlantic v. Twombley, the Court will decide whether allegations of parallel competitive conduct by defendants, coupled with a simple assertion that such conduct is the result of a conspiracy, states a claim under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. In the decision below, the Second Circuit held that it does, despite the fact that it is settled law that parallel conduct alone does not entitle the plaintiff to relief.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from