Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MAY 2023

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

DOJ: No-Poach Dismissal Was Wrong On The Law

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

Lisa Phelan spoke with Global Competition Review about United States v. Patel and what it means for other no-poach prosecutions and per se offenses.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

Lisa Phelan spoke with Global Competition Review about United States v. Patel and what it means for other no-poach prosecutions and per se offenses.

"The DOJ may want to re-focus its resources on some more classic cartel conduct, that may lead to court opinions that re-establish some of these per se principles that DOJ historically relied on to build winning cases," Lisa said.

Read the full article (subscription required).

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from