Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 DECEMBER 2021

DOJ Antitrust Targets (Again) No-Poach Hiring Agreements

Last week, the U.S. Department of Justice reiterated its strong message to the business community: Be very careful with no-poach hiring agreements.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

Last week, the U.S. Department of Justice reiterated its strong message to the business community: Be very careful with no-poach hiring agreements.

DOJ unsealed criminal charges on Thursday against a former director of global engineering services at Pratt & Whitney (Mahesh Patel). According to DOJ, Patel and executives of Pratt & Whitney's suppliers allegedly agreed not to recruit each other's engineers and skilled workers. DOJ has warned companies that these types of agreements may unlawfully limit employee wages and constitute an illegal restraint of trade under Section 1 of the Sherman Act.

DOJ's recent acceleration in criminal prosecution of no-poach agreements has considerably raised the stakes. This year alone, the DOJ has brought three criminal cases against (i) Surgical Care Affiliates, (ii) Ryan Hee and Advantage On Call, as well as (iii) DaVita, Inc. and its former CEO Kent Thiry for no-poach agreements, and, in the latter two cases, corresponding wage

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from