Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 FEBRUARY 2015

Does DOJ’s Victory Over American Express Foreshadow More Antitrust Challenges To Come?

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

American Express has rules that prohibit merchants from discriminating against American Express cards in favor of those issued by other card networks.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

American Express has rules that prohibit merchants from discriminating against American Express cards in favor of those issued by other card networks. On February 18, 2015, following a seven-week trial, Judge Garaufis in the Eastern District of New York issued a decision siding with the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), and holding that these Non-Discrimination Provisions (NDPs) were restraints of trade in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act (the "Decision"). The Decision was based on a full Rule of Reason analysis of the competitive effects of the challenged provisions. The DOJ's victory, including a finding that American Express had market power notwithstanding its 26.4% share of the relevant market, is likely to embolden the agency and private plaintiffs to bring challenges under the rule of reason to other "vertical restraints," i.e., agreements between firms at different levels of the production and distribution process relating to the terms on which

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from