Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 OCTOBER 2017

D.C. District Judge Denies Class Certification In Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Case

The court's two-and-a-half-page Order cited three main deficiencies in the damages regression model proffered by Plaintiffs' lead expert.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

Paul Hitchcock is a Senior Policy Advisor for Holland & Knight's Jacksonville office.

In the most closely watched rail industry litigation in the country, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has denied class certification in the railroads' fuel surcharge antitrust litigation.

The long awaited decision comes in In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1869. This case, now a decade old, has been to the D.C. Circuit once on class certification and was remanded. Following a week-long second hearing, a decision on class certification had been pending for a year.

The fundamental allegation in the case is that the defendants, the four largest railroads in the United States, conspired to set fuel surcharges that were stated as a percentage of the base rate each assesses its customers. In denying class certification, the court found that plaintiffs failed to meet Rule 23's requirement that questions of law or fact common to the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from