Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 MARCH 2013

Clearance: Proskauer's Quarterly Antitrust Update - Winter 2013

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

On March 25, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in "Federal Trade Commission v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.", and take a step toward concluding a long-running and acrimonious dispute.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

WATSON AND REVERSE PAYMENTS: AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESOLVE THE COMPETING TENSION BETWEEN ANTITRUST AND PATENT LAW UNDER THE HATCH-WAXMAN ACT

On March 25, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Federal Trade Commission v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,1 and take a step toward concluding a long-running and acrimonious dispute between the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") and several Circuit Courts of Appeal regarding whether patent settlements under the Hatch-Waxman Act2 containing "reverse payments" violate the Sherman Antitrust Act. For many years, the FTC has taken the position3 that such payments presumptively violate the Sherman Act, only to be rebuffed by the Second, Sixth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuits4 as well as by the Supreme Court's refusal to hear the issue until now.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from