Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2013

Another Court Holds Daubert Analysis Required When Critical To Class Certification

This Alert focuses on a recent decision by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania in a multidistrict price-fixing antitrust case.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

With a split among the Circuits, no authoritative decision from the Third Circuit, and certiorari already granted by the U.S. Supreme Court on the issue, another district court has concluded that a thorough Daubert analysis is appropriate and necessary at the class certification stage when the expert testimony at issue is critical to the determination of class certification. In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litig., 08-MDL-1935 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 7, 2012).

In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litigation is a multidistrict price-fixing antitrust case brought pursuant to Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, as well as various state antitrust and consumer protection statutes. In that case, the Direct Purchasers alleged that Defendants, multi national corporate entities who produce approximately 75 percent of America's chocolate confectionary products, conspired to implement three price increases on chocolate from 2002 through 2007. The Direct Purchasers

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from