Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 MARCH 2021

A US Perspective – Should The Patent Procurement Process Fall Under The Remit Of Antitrust Law?

Bristows LLP
Bristows LLP
Contributor
Bristows LLP

Bristows LLP

We are Bristows, the world’s leading specialist law firm for clients that innovate. We are a London...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bristows LLP

An amicus curiae brief recently filed by the US Department of Justice ("DoJ") has provided insight into the evolving US position on this grey area of antitrust law.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Sophie Lawrance
Sophie Lawrance
Helena Connors
Helena Connors

An amicus curiae brief recently filed by the US Department of Justice ("DoJ") has provided insight into the evolving US position on this grey area of antitrust law.

An antitrust suit filed against AbbVie and biosimilar companies on behalf of indirect US purchasers of Humira claimed Abbvie's strategy of filing of over 100 patents for Humira amounted to a 'patent thicket'. The decision was appealed to the US Court of Appeals after being dismissed in its entirety at first instance and the DoJ has now submitted an amicus curiae brief. In this brief, the DoJ has clearly set out its view on the lawfulness of 'patent thickets' and has suggested that deficiencies in the patent system should not "be remedied by antitrust law".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Right To Repair Alert: Deere & Company Reaches Settlement With FTC, States

The Federal Trade Commission and five State Attorneys General have reached a landmark settlement with Deere & Company in a year-and-a-half antitrust litigation over the agricultural equipment manufacturer's restrictions on repair resources. The stipulated order, if approved, will require Deere to provide farmers and independent repair providers with the same repair tools and technical resources available to authorized dealers for a period of ten years.
United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Axinn LLP
Axinn LLP
Article

New York-Presbyterian Hospital Ruling Signals Widening Antitrust Exposure For Hospital Contracting Practices

A federal court ruling against New York Presbyterian Hospital validates DOJ theories that market power can be proven through supracompetitive pricing rather than market share alone, and that exclusionary conduct is not required for antitrust claims. This decision expands potential antitrust exposure for hospital systems employing restrictive contracting practices like all-products provisions, anti-tiering terms, and gag clauses...
United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Article

Life Sciences Antitrust Quarterly Update Q3 2026

This quarterly update examines key antitrust developments in life sciences during Q3 2026, including the FTC's investigation of Boston Scientific's $14.5 billion Penumbra acquisition, the DOJ's record $250 million HSR penalty against KKR, and European regulatory actions involving Sanofi and Align Technology. The analysis also explores the UK's pro-innovation approach to healthcare AI regulation and its implications for the medical device industry.
GlobalAntitrust/Competition Law
Goodwin Procter LLP
Goodwin Procter LLP
Article

Spotlight On Agentic AI | Liability

As businesses increasingly deploy agentic AI systems capable of autonomous decision-making and actions, questions arise about supplier liability when AI agents malfunction or produce unexpected results. This article examines the contractual frameworks governing agentic AI relationships, revealing how standard IT contracts may inadequately address the unique risks of autonomous AI systems and exploring strategies for customers to better protect themselves against potential losses from AI agent failures.
United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law
Bristows LLP
Bristows LLP
Article

SAS Institute Inc v. World Programming Limited The ECJ Reference And Potential Implications For Software Licensors

The proceedings between SAS Institute Inc ("SAS") and World Programming Limited, ("WPL") which led to an extensive judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in July 2010, have resulted in nine questions, principally relating to the interpretation of the Software Directive, being referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union ("ECJ").
United KingdomIntellectual Property
Bristows LLP
Bristows LLP