Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MAY 2005

Stop! That’s No Way For A Lady To Perform

In LauritzenCool v Lady Navigation Inc - the Commercial Court considered whether an injunction preventing Owners from employing their vessel other than in accordance with a particular charterparty was tantamount to an order for specific performance.

United KingdomTransport
Carlo Sammarco
Carlo Sammarco

In LauritzenCool v Lady Navigation Inc - the Commercial Court considered whether an injunction preventing Owners from employing their vessel other than in accordance with a particular charterparty was tantamount to an order for specific performance.

In November of last year, in LauritzenCool AB v Lady Navigation Inc [2004] All ER (D) 225 (Nov), Cooke J in the Commercial Court had to consider whether an injunction restraining Lady Navigation ("Owners") from, (1) taking any steps preventing the performance of Time charters entered into with LauritzenCool ("Charterers"); (2) employing the chartered vessels in a manner inconsistent with such charters; or (3) fixing the vessels with a third party within the period of the charters, was tantamount to an order for specific performance which, according to trite law, was not an available remedy.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from