Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 JUNE 2008

Kosmar Villa

On 29 February 2008, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Kosmar Villa Holidays v Trustees of Syndicate 1243 (2008).

United KingdomTransport
Chris Zavos
Chris Zavos
Leon Alexander
Leon Alexander

On 29 February 2008, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Kosmar Villa Holidays v Trustees of Syndicate 1243 (2008). The Kosmar case concerned waiver by election and whether insurers can, by taking some step, lose the right to rely on a "late notice" defence.

Kosmar was a tour operator which held liability insurance with Euclidian. On 22 August 2002, one of Kosmar's holiday guests suffered serious injuries following an accident. Yet, in breach of a general insurance policy condition which required immediate notification to the insurer of any injury, Kosmar failed to notify Euclidian until over one year later, on 4 September 2003, following receipt of a letter from the injured party's solicitors dated 14 August 2003.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from