Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JANUARY 2025

Hedging And Damages For Breach Of Contract

Quadrant Chambers
Quadrant Chambers
Contributor
Explore more from Quadrant Chambers

In Rhine Shipping v Vitol [2024], the Court of Appeal upheld the decision that Vitol's internal swaps, unaffected by Rhine's breach of contract, did not reduce Vitol's damages. Rhine's re-cast appeal was dismissed due to lack of trial evidence.

United KingdomTransport

Rhine Shipping DMCC v Vitol SA [2024] EWCA Civ 580

In Rhine Shipping v Vitol [2024] EWCA Civ 580, the Court of Appeal heard an appeal from the judgment of Simon Birt KC (reported at [2024] 1 Lloyd's Rep 652) in which the Deputy Judge concluded that profits on internal swaps booked within Vitol's risk management system, and which were varied in response to Rhine Shipping's breach of a voyage charter, did not reduce Vitol's damages for breach of contract. That was because (i) such swaps – being purely internal – had no effect on Vitol's financial position; (ii) a portfolio of risks which had booked a gain in respect of those internal swaps could not be treated as a separate legal entity from another portfolio of risks which had made an equal and opposite loss on those internal swaps; (iii) even if Vitol could be treated as having made a gain on the internal swaps, the gain was to be ignored for the purpose of assessing Vitol's damages on the basis that such benefit

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from