Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MARCH 2022

Tulip Trading Ltd v Bitcoin Association For BSV & Others

The much anticipated judgment in Tulip Trading Ltd v Bitcoin Association for BSV & others [2022] EWHC 667 (Ch) was published this morning.

United KingdomTechnology

The much anticipated judgment in Tulip Trading Ltd v Bitcoin Association for BSV & others [2022] EWHC 667 (Ch) was published this morning. James Ramsden QC of Astraea Group acted for the leading group of successful defendants. The judgment is the most important so far in the cryptocurrency and blockchain space as its consequences are fundamental to how the underlying technology works within the law.

The court found that open source Bitcoin software developers whose code is widely adopted and used to trade or store cryptocurrencies owe neither fiduciary duties nor a common law duty of care to those who use that code to store or trade their crypto assets. Tulip had claimed $4.5bn from sixteen developers alleging that they owed fiduciary and common law duties to come to its aid by writing and applying a “patch” to the blockchain network in order to reverse an alleged hack that had led to the claimed loss of its Bitcoin.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from