Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 MARCH 2011

DCC And Statutory Fictions

Slaughter and May
Slaughter and May
Contributor
Slaughter and May

Slaughter and May

Slaughter and May is an international full-service law firm, trusted by leading businesses and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Slaughter and May

The saga that is the case of DCC Holdings (UK) Limited v HMRC Commissioners has finally reached its conclusion in the form of a single judgment delivered on 15 December by Lord Walker on behalf of all of the Supreme Court Judges.

United KingdomTax
Sara Luder
Sara Luder

This article appeared in the February 2011 issue of the 'Financial Instruments Tax and Accounting Review'

The saga that is the case of DCC Holdings (UK) Limited v HMRC Commissioners has finally reached its conclusion in the form of a single judgment delivered on 15 December by Lord Walker on behalf of all of the Supreme Court Judges. Given that the Supreme Court is likely to hear far fewer appeals of this nature than the House of Lords, the decision is interesting not just in its implications for the loan relationship regime but also as an indication of how the Supreme Court believes "statutory fictions" should be interpreted.

THE FACTS

In 2001 DCC, a UK resident company, entered into a number of net paying repos with a non-UK resident bank ("the Bank").

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from