Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 NOVEMBER 2022

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Proof By Sampling In Construction Disputes

It is not uncommon in large construction projects for disputes to arise which involve several thousand alleged variations (or change orders) and/or alleged defects which need to be considered...

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

It is not uncommon in large construction projects for disputes to arise which involve several thousand alleged variations (or change orders) and/or alleged defects which need to be considered by the arbitral Tribunal or Court in the formal dispute resolution process chosen by the parties.

In addition to the often-extensive factual evidence, this usually gives rise to the need for expert evidence to be adduced dealing with the cause-and-effect liability issues as well as possible delay and quantum claims which arise as a result.

Parties and their appointed experts in many jurisdictions are now required to adopt a proportionate approach whereby they do not "use a sledgehammer to crack a nut" but this can mean different things in different situations. The concept of proportionality is not formulaic in nature.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from